<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redeeming Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-warforge.com/lotd/redeeming-features/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-warforge.com/lotd/redeeming-features</link>
	<description>Miniature Modelling and Conversion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 19:19:12 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Made Of Bees</title>
		<link>http://www.the-warforge.com/lotd/redeeming-features/comment-page-1#comment-38869</link>
		<dc:creator>Made Of Bees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-warforge.com/?p=1546#comment-38869</guid>
		<description>I mean the flamer nozzles, surely, but the entire thickness of the whole forearm looks off. Look at the distance between the inner bend of the elbow out to the tip of that fuel tank thing- in my eyes, that&#039;s where the trouble begins. The whole weapon assembly just spills out of that elbow bracket and gets more blocky as it goes along. I think that this looks fine with the whole armored brick thing Terminators have, but this is a more streamlined case of armor and demands a weapon mount closer to the proportions of it&#039;s opposite arm. I think the shoulder and elbow can be saved, with some dremeling to make the elbow less bulky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean the flamer nozzles, surely, but the entire thickness of the whole forearm looks off. Look at the distance between the inner bend of the elbow out to the tip of that fuel tank thing- in my eyes, that&#8217;s where the trouble begins. The whole weapon assembly just spills out of that elbow bracket and gets more blocky as it goes along. I think that this looks fine with the whole armored brick thing Terminators have, but this is a more streamlined case of armor and demands a weapon mount closer to the proportions of it&#8217;s opposite arm. I think the shoulder and elbow can be saved, with some dremeling to make the elbow less bulky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ein</title>
		<link>http://www.the-warforge.com/lotd/redeeming-features/comment-page-1#comment-38611</link>
		<dc:creator>Ein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-warforge.com/?p=1546#comment-38611</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think the Terminator arm is my current winner, but I&#039;m just going to try slinging a flamer under the stock power fist arm and seeing how that looks. I can certainly change the nozzles on the flamer pretty easily, in any case.

Bees, what do you mean by &#039;out of proportion&#039; - are you talking about the flamer nozzles themselves, or something different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think the Terminator arm is my current winner, but I&#8217;m just going to try slinging a flamer under the stock power fist arm and seeing how that looks. I can certainly change the nozzles on the flamer pretty easily, in any case.</p>
<p>Bees, what do you mean by &#8216;out of proportion&#8217; &#8211; are you talking about the flamer nozzles themselves, or something different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wokkers</title>
		<link>http://www.the-warforge.com/lotd/redeeming-features/comment-page-1#comment-38510</link>
		<dc:creator>wokkers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-warforge.com/?p=1546#comment-38510</guid>
		<description>termie arm for the win - but as MadeOfBees suggested, tweak the flamer assembly. change the nozzles for a start, as the 3rd ed ones are rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>termie arm for the win &#8211; but as MadeOfBees suggested, tweak the flamer assembly. change the nozzles for a start, as the 3rd ed ones are rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Made Of Bees</title>
		<link>http://www.the-warforge.com/lotd/redeeming-features/comment-page-1#comment-38434</link>
		<dc:creator>Made Of Bees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-warforge.com/?p=1546#comment-38434</guid>
		<description>I am in agreement- the Terminator arm. However, I think that the flamer assembly itself needs some attention- it looks really out of proportion with the rest of the model to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in agreement- the Terminator arm. However, I think that the flamer assembly itself needs some attention- it looks really out of proportion with the rest of the model to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquakroot</title>
		<link>http://www.the-warforge.com/lotd/redeeming-features/comment-page-1#comment-38226</link>
		<dc:creator>aquakroot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-warforge.com/?p=1546#comment-38226</guid>
		<description>Definately go with the Terminator arm. It has character.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definately go with the Terminator arm. It has character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

